August 22, 2008
Posted: 1412 GMT

On Sunday the baton passes to London (sorry for the pun) for the 2012 Summer Games. But as we have seen in the 4×100 relay with both American squads, it's easy to fumble the exchange and suffer indignation for the next four years.

London's Olympic park will transform the city's east.
London's Olympic park will transform the city's east.

London 2012 organizers have sworn that the city will be ready - and ready a year early. Of course we've heard that before only to see venues finished with just weeks to go. I seem to recall the last minute renovations for beach volleyball in Athens.
London has a right to be confident of a gold medal. The International Olympic Committee said the progress on the Olympic Park is "truly outstanding" with four years to go. The park has been a massive building site for a year already. 

There is little else for London to build. Some of the rest of the venues are existing world-class structures (Wimbledon for tennis, Wembley for football, Eton Dorney for rowing). Then there is the usual temporary use of existing buildings (the ‘Dome' for gymnastics, Earls Court for volleyball, ExCel Centre for boxing, table tennis, weight lifting and martial arts). London is also proud that there will be the last minute transformation of iconic sites just for the games (the Queen's horses will be pushed aside at Horse Guards Parade for the barely-dressed Beach Volleyball participants).

The credit crunch has made it difficult for private contractors to get funding to build the athletics' housing. The money is coming from the existing budget for now, but will have to be paid back. At least that's the plan.

The British press continues to focus on this budget. It was set last year at £9.3bn ($17bn) and has not moved. It was a lot smaller when the 2012 Games were awarded in 2005, but tax and security was added along with a contingency cushion. Then there is the rise in steel prices.

The games themselves will cost a further $4bn and be paid for by corporations, TV rights, merchandise, ticket sales etc.)

That budget - much of which will be spent on lasting projects that will transform east London – has not moved once.

And that is why London won the games instead of Paris.

London promised to clean up an industrial wasteland. I was at the site two weeks ago and the biggest structures on site are massive machines that literally wash the soil for reuse. The rivers are also being cleaned up and the ugly power lines are being buried below the whole area. 90 percent of the industrial waste (bricks etc.) is staying on site to build foundations for the venues.

So now with the budget set and the building well underway, everyone is asking what will be left afterwards.

The stadium will be cut down from 80,000 seats to 25,000 and become the home for the country's athletics. The various cycling venues will be relocated next to the new velodrome being built near the stadium. Britain won four times as many medals in cycling in Beijing compared the next country and it wants to build on that success with a focused national cycling center.

But many people want to know how London will benefit beyond sports, particularly since tax payers, lottery players and local councils are footing much of the bill.

East London is ethnically diverse with high unemployment, high crime, and few decent stores, even though it is just a few miles from the bank towers of Canary Wharf.

Organizers say the Olympic site will be transformed into to the biggest urban park constructed in Europe for 150 years. New transportation links will fill a region devoid of infrastructure and the Olympic Village will be sold off for thousands of homes. There is already a massive mall being built on the edge of the site.

But critics are worried that falling land values will be force the Olympic Delivery Authority to sell the land off to the highest bidder to help pay back some of the government's bills. They want the London's mayor to promise that some land will simply be handed over to local groups (as was hinted to years ago).

Britain has done much better than expected in the Beijing Olympics and that will put pressure of the organizers to get it right. Many people in Britain will judge that on whether the budget proves to be optimistic and whether the government continues to support Team GB with the amount of money needed to build on Beijing's success.

Posted by: ,
Filed under: London 2012 • Olympics


Share this on:
mark   August 22nd, 2008 1646 GMT

but how on earth can they hope to match the Beijing opening ceremony-extravaganza?!?!

Jason B.   August 22nd, 2008 1743 GMT

I like that the Londoners are utilizing existing sites for some events and are willing to clean up other areas to build there. It also seems as though they've got a decent idea what they'll do with the construction after the Games are done. Good luck to them! I can't wait to see what they come up with.

Steffan   August 22nd, 2008 1824 GMT

While some on the outside may see the transformation of East London as a good thing, I'm sure that there are plenty of people who live in East London who decry the demolition and construction happenings and probably make the case that others would be incensed as well if they decided to raze Soho in NY for or Watts in Los Angeles for Olympic purposes.

Having been to the East End, I'm split as to whether this was a good decision, regardless of the budgetary concerns.

Ric G   August 22nd, 2008 1941 GMT

Does a coxless men's 4 boat mean that they are all eunuchs?

K Lovering   August 22nd, 2008 1949 GMT

I hope it is a success! I have lots of friends in London! So me being there for the 2012 Olympics is a go!

andy dufrain   August 22nd, 2008 2018 GMT

I live in and around the Olympic Village area (Bow & Redbridge) and I am very pleased to say that it will bring a lot of investment to the area. Already we have see a huge amount of dissused space being developed by different developers not connected to the Olympics. This is a knock on effect of the infestment as people will see that this area will be developed further and their own investments will pay back good.

I know that my property prices will hike up and we will definetly see a lot me transport and other areas being improved.

PS: Liverpool fan so I would ideally like the KOP to move into the full capacity stadium when it is done but fat chance of that happening!

Tristan   August 23rd, 2008 020 GMT

yes, but they always have a ball

Ralph Sato   August 23rd, 2008 036 GMT

Reading and viewing the continuous gripes about how the IOC authorities have mishandled the 2008 Olympic games in various publications and thinking about the politicization that has soured past Olympic games like Munich, Moscow, and the unforgettable Nazi Olympic games of 1936 convinces me that the London games in 2012 will be the last for this increasingly meaningless variety of so-called sports (why is there both regular team volleyball and beach volleyball ) on the agenda?

Charles Edmund   August 23rd, 2008 124 GMT

I believe the controversy over the age of the Chinese gymnasts may be a simple case of miscomunication. According to web site:

http://www.asia-home.com/china/cncaps.php?lang=en,

The Chinese count the age starting from the birth, every Chinese lunar year which you will traverse count for one year more however your month of birth.

A baby born on December 24, 2008, for example, will be 2 years old on January 1, 2009, because it will have traversed 2 years 2008 and 2009, whereas its Gregorian age is one week.

In the final analysis, you will always have a year even 2 years more in Chinese age in Chinese lunar calendar than your Gregorian age in solar calendar.

Hope this helps!

HCL   August 23rd, 2008 300 GMT

Ethically diverse?

Tim   August 23rd, 2008 351 GMT

In referring to East London, I think you meant "ethnically diverse", not "ethically diverse", though I suspect that may also be the case.

Bev   August 23rd, 2008 1155 GMT

The main problem for the London olympics is that it seems the majority of the rest of the UK isn't keen on it. Most of the UK already harbor ill feelings towards London and the south east for siphoning a great deal of public funds. And seeing even more go for the olympics, in which most of them don't consider it to benefit anywhere but London, feelings are very wary over it.

Derrick   August 23rd, 2008 1308 GMT

Regarding London matching the Beijing Opening Ceremony – they won't. The sheer scale and tenacity of the Chinese to impress the world cannot be duplicated, plus London really doesn't have anything to prove. It will be interesting to see their follow-up performance, however.

tony h   August 23rd, 2008 1316 GMT

the olympics opportunity ....
- it puts cash into the economy
- it stimulates the property market
- it puts a spotlight on the tourism offering
- it is an engineering, design and innovation showcase

never could an opportunity be more perfectly timed, surely?

Britain should embrace it and perhaps this is the time for the 2012 Olympics branding machine to be put its most valuable use on behalf of the entire country.

John   August 23rd, 2008 1336 GMT

We all want the olympics over here but we are just annoyed it is costing so much... Have you seen the olympic logo we spent $800,000 approx, it isn't exactly the kind of thing you'd buy for that much. and also we just want to compete and do well! And of course we are all wondering how on earth we are going to compare to the beijing opening ceremony!!
also i don't understand how they are going to move 55,000 seats out of the stadium... can anyone explain? And if they can roughly how much will that cost?

Food shortage   August 23rd, 2008 1935 GMT

Boycott the London thugs and free Northen Ireland!

Ralph Sato   August 24th, 2008 337 GMT

As an example of a stinging rebuke of the meaningless proliferation of "sports" in the "modern" Olympics games, I offer excerpts from a column that appeared recently. After a lamentation over the loss of the gold medal in women's softball by the US team to Japan after having won the last three gold medals, the author sighs saying "Yet, paradoxically, this result was good news for them in their campaign to get softball – booted out with baseball for 2012 – back into the Olympics for 2016. Here at last is the first shred of evidence that this sport is not a total US monopoly." The author says he hopes the campaign will fail and goes on with his extended lamentation of the state of the Games. "There is a very strong case for evicting all sports where the Olympics do not resemble the pinnacle of excellence (which gets rid of tennis and football as well as baseball). You could also throw out all the other team games (hockey, handball, basketball etc), anything reliant on horses (equestrianism, modern pentathlon) and anything decided primarily by judges' opinions (gymnastics, diving) or interpretations (boxing, fencing)." There is more of course in the article but suffice it to say that this is one of a genre of critical pieces that I have run across in print.

Sid Hill, Starkville, Mississippi   August 25th, 2008 059 GMT

As to whether or not London will "drop the baton," I guess that depends on how you define it. But (even tho' I'm a clueless American) there are several things of which I am fairly confident. The UK won't censor the internet. The UK won't deny admission to the country because they don't like a person's politics. The UK won't lock up political protestors just to keep things quiet during the Olympics. And there won't be any suspicions that perhaps the UK has fabricated passports in order to use 14-year-old gymnasts.

I'm looking forward to it. Sure, there are some problems in London. There are problems everywhere. But in my several trips to the UK, I have found the Brits to be honest, remarkably tolerant, and overall genuinely welcoming to visitors.

christimarie   August 25th, 2008 2031 GMT

I am looking forward to the London Olympics. No fake fireworks, no telling children that they aren't cute enough to represent the country, no trampling over the rights of the citizens to put on a big phony show. Only countries with inferiority complexes would feel the need to put on such an extravagant "display". Whatever the City of London does, it will be preferable to the cheat and fake of Beijing.

snowman121   August 26th, 2008 624 GMT

London is a joke, how can they get even closer to Beijing? A nasty logo does not inspire people, and lack of money does not inspire confidence. London is old and tired, I wonder why it even bothered to apply? There are so many other places can do better. It is not like London did not have it turn before. I heard that they are not even going to do the torch relay, what a joke? After trying to disrupt the Beijing torch, now they are worrying about their own political baggage. London is just going to shot its own foot again and again. BTW, the handover show London put on during the closing ceremony sucks, what was that all about?

allen   August 28th, 2008 213 GMT

I am thai person,
british government refused to extradite corrupt ex premier taksin, because taksin can invest much of taxpayers' money in Britain. our thai people are suffering from poverty, we can't afford for food. so I would use this chance to call for all kind people around world to boycott london olympics, .

bobbrush   September 1st, 2008 402 GMT

To christimarie.

Certainly no lack of self-confidence amongst pommies. Yes, Rule Britannia! Brtannia rules the waves. Welcome Londonistan 2012!!

Emeka   September 1st, 2008 2001 GMT

It's a great opportunity for london to host the 2012 olympic game,the biggest fiester in the world.How i wish i would be present,you guyz are doing great . keep it up.

pepski   October 11th, 2008 2111 GMT

The london games isnt about trying to top the bejing games! Londons games is about reboulding a run down part of the city, the olympics are just a fantastic reason for the government to act and rejenerate a run down area in the city!
London has nothing to prove, its the number one finalcial district in the world, ahead of new york, and it wa sthe centre of the largest empire the world has ever known!
Britania rules the waves, god save the queen, go London!!!!!

Leave Your Comment


 

Comments are moderated by CNN, in accordance with the CNN Comment Policy, and may not appear on this blog until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting. Also, due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be posted.


subscribe RSS Icon
About this blog

Receive updates from across the world on the 2008 Summer Olympic Games. "Olympics and the World" is a blog offering you the thoughts and observations from athletes, journalists around unique personalities preparing for the Olympics in China. Whether it's from the training field, the newsroom or the homes of everyday people, "Olympics and the World" provides you a global pulse as the Beijing Olympics approach.

Special Report: Beijing 2008

Athletes
Peter Reed Peter Reed is a British rower who will be part of the men's coxless four boat in Beijing. At 26-years old, he has only been rowing for six years after being spotted in a gym while using a rowing machine. He has had a rapid rise in the sport, having already tasted gold in World Cup events.
Read Peter's posts.
Claudia Rivero Claudia Rivero is Peru's top-ranked badminton player and will be a member of one of the smallest national squads going to Beijing. Based in Germany she received an Olympic scholarship. This will be her first Olympic Games.
Read Claudia's posts.
Gilbert Tuhabonye Gilbert Tuhabonye is a marathon runner who escaped the ethnic violence of Burundi to find a new life in the U.S. As well as coaching athletics he has been trying to fulfill his dream of competing at the Olympics. He is also the author of "The Running Man and "This Voice in my Heart."
Read Gilbert's posts.

Categories
Powered by WordPress.com VIP